The lawgical implication stems from, "necessarily accompanies." This is the only indicator phrase in the whole sentence so that's where your focus should lie. Next, determine which variable that phrase is modifying. I.e., which of the two variables …
You're essentially saying that if a necessary condition is affirmed, its sufficient condition must also be affirmed which is something we know we can't do because there could be other necessary conditions involved that aren't mentioned in the stimul…
Check out the second and third sentences. The inference behind the verbiage is that 51% of the largest number ever, will always be greater than 50% of any smaller number.
For my explanation to make sense, we first have to agree that more cookbooks …
I think you had it right in that the author is saying that capricious enforcement is unlikely. He justifies this prediction by saying that although capricious enforcement could occur, since some acts are illegal according to some overly broad law, l…
I think E is saying the opposite of what we need. Here's what I mean. We are told that our minds make up images for what our eyes see by forming mental constructs. We are also told that these mental constructs are usually accurate, but in the case o…
I'd talk to attorneys if I were you to get an idea of why people hate BigLaw and whether that much debt is justified for that kind of school.
I personally think people hate BigLaw, not necessarily for the hours or hostile work environment, but beca…
@Sami Oh wow, excuse the typo! My comment should have had the "ski-related" incidents going from a hypothetical 30 to 12, not the alcohol-related incidents. My comment must have been mad confusing.
Either way, I agree in that the relationship given…
I like how there are different ways to view stimuli!
I interpreted this as a "percentage" to "absolute amount" error. We know the rate went from 10% to 25%, but that doesn't mean the nominal/actual amount of those injuries increased. We would actua…
I'm not sure there are cookie cutter structures specific to Art and Law, but if you try and read from the author's perspective throughout the entire passage, regardless of subject, you'll find them a lot easier to digest.
Myungsook says converting observations into numbers is the hardest and last task and can only be done when you have thoroughly explored the observations themselves. That sentence implies that careful observations (to be synonymous with "thoroughly e…
But, like I said, this begs the question as to what type of movement creates the error?
I think the kind of movement that creates the error you're referring to is the kind that occurs without their being light to hit the molecule before the mov…
We can ignore the math - sort of - and get this question right!
I think the main thing to focus on is how the change in rate (regardless of whether we're talking about gas price or electricity rate) affects us, assuming we're using the "better" pro…
I think of Purpose answers as the low-res summaries of MP answers
e.g.
MP a.c. - The author thinks the economists are wrong in assuming the manufacturing industry will soon be gone in America.
Purpose a.c. - To refute an assumption held by a grou…
I'd use the one that fits your learning style as well as plays to the writing style you most prefer. The Trainer is conversational. The Bibles are more to the point and mechanistic. 7sage has a unique forum on which it feels like JY is speaking to y…
Agreed with @MissChanandler . A buddy of mine used his writing center at his undergrad and he churned out some solid statements - albeit they were for a PhD program, not law school, but I think that's irrelevant.
I'd say go for the people who are g…
I'd agree with @"Cant Get Right" . The more you write out explanations the more you'll begin to notice if your explanations seem repetitive in that you'll notice that you keep having to write out explanations for "flaw types with abstractly worded a…
Thanks @bobalicious !
Understood on the contrapositive/converse explanation. I believe Powerscore calls it "mistaken" because in the context of conditionality; if given A implies B and then we're given B by a premise, it would be "mistaken" - at le…
Thank you @BlindReviewer ! I meant to say I thought this was a mistaken negation flaw, NOT a mistaken reversal.
I thought the flaw was stating that since neutering usually leads to improper bone development and that definitely ("in turn leads to" …
@bobalicious
This is what I was thinking:
Premises:
Neuter => Arthritis
Therefore,
/Neuter => /Arthritis
I think I'm wrong in trying to import a lawgical relationship into the stimulus when one doesn't exist. Something "usually leading …
D gives us an irrelevant comparison! We know that in both scenarios, the average payout is lower than the cost - thereby losing us money - except it's okay to be at a loss with insurance but for some reason it's not okay for the lottery because of a…
My first LR was the experimental I think. It was definitely the toughest and left me devoid of the confidence I normally have when beginning a test. I was glad to flip to the next section to see it was games which I normally crush. I did just that f…
I found reading dense books while studying helped. I've gotten a couple questions wrong in RC because I didn't know the definition of a word, but it rarely happens.
Yeah this is tough... the good news is that I think I follow your reasoning.
Given your original interpretation, we could have medicine that does, in fact, reduce stress, but it also treats the stress-caused illness via another way like hormone inh…